Skip to content

Suggested

Language: English. French, Portuguese and Arabic are in preparation.

Discuss your project

Evidence before adjectives.

Trust infrastructure is bought on consequence. See the situations, outcomes and operating evidence behind what Seamfix says it can do.
verified identities
350M+
organisations on one governed ecosystem
170+
countries reached by a digital credential service
68
years of identity-infrastructure delivery
18+

Every case shows the same six things.

Where a client has not approved naming, the case is clearly anonymised. We do not use fabricated testimonials.

  1. 01Outcome
  2. 02Situation
  3. 03Seamfix response
  4. 04Evidence created
  5. 05What it proves
  6. 06Reference status

Priority case stories.

Telecommunications

Subscriber-registration remediation delivered inside a 10-day regulatory window.

Situation
A mobile operator was given a fixed regulatory deadline to bring subscriber registrations into line, while its network and sales channels had to keep operating.
Seamfix response
Seamfix mobilised registration capture, verification and agent controls at operating scale, prioritised the records under scrutiny and reported progress against the deadline.
Evidence created
Each remediated registration linked to the identity presented, the agent and device that captured it, and the checks that ran.
What it proves
Seamfix can move identity infrastructure at national scale when a regulator, not the project plan, sets the timetable.
Platform capability you can infer
Capture anywhere, biometric services, device management, reporting & audit.
Reference status
Anonymised. Named reference available under NDA, subject to client approval.
Subscriber registration record
Remediation
Identity presentedVerified against source
Biometric checkMatch · quality pass
Registering agentAG-•••• 1042 · active
Capture deviceRegistered device
Regulatory windowDay 7 of 10
Evidence packReady for audit

Illustrative interface · masked data

Government

170+ organisations operating on one governed identity ecosystem.

Situation
A central identity authority needed many licensed participants to enrol and serve citizens without fragmenting policy, data quality or oversight.
Seamfix response
A multi-tenant model in which the authority sets policy centrally and each licensed participant operates inside its own governed tenant.
Evidence created
Participant activity attributed to tenant, operator, device and policy, with approved visibility for the central authority.
What it proves
A governed ecosystem can widen participation without the authority surrendering control of policy or evidence.
Platform capability you can infer
Multi-tenant governance, identity & authentication, device management, reporting & audit.
Reference status
Reference status to be confirmed through the claims register before naming.
Central authority view
Multi-tenant
Policy set by the authority · applied to every tenant
  • Licensed participant ·01Active
  • Licensed participant ·02Active
  • Licensed participant ·03Review
  • Licensed participant ·04Active

Illustrative interface · masked data

Government

A sovereign credential service reaching citizens in 68 countries.

Situation
Citizens living abroad needed to renew a passport without travelling home or depending on limited consular capacity.
Seamfix response
ePass took application, identity assurance, payment, approval tracking and fulfilment status online, while the issuing authority kept policy and the final decision.
Evidence created
Each application linked to the verified applicant, the documents presented, the payment and the authority's decision.
What it proves
A government can extend a sovereign service internationally without moving authority away from the issuing institution.
Platform capability you can infer
Credential services, capture anywhere, review & approval, API & source integration.
Reference status
Republic of Benin passport-renewal service. Use with current reference permission and operating data.
Passport renewal · status
Citizen abroad
  1. Application submitted
  2. Identity & documents assured
  3. Payment confirmed
  4. Authority review & decisionIssuing authority
  5. Fulfilment & delivery

Policy, data and the final decision stay with the government.

Illustrative interface · masked data

Public workforce

Payroll identities re-established against verified, unique people.

Situation
An employer could not be certain that every person on its payroll was real, unique and still entitled to be paid — the ghost-worker and duplicate-person problem.
Seamfix response
Biometric enrolment and de-duplication bound each payroll record to one verified person, with mismatches routed to accountable human review.
Evidence created
A person-level trail linking payroll identity, uniqueness checks, review decisions and the resulting record changes.
What it proves
Human assurance and data remediation can remove ghost and duplicate identities without disrupting legitimate staff.
Platform capability you can infer
Biometric services, review & approval, reporting & audit.
Reference status
Anonymised. Details available under NDA.
Payroll identity review
Remediation

Record ·4471

Payroll identity

Record ·9310

Payroll identity

! Biometric uniqueness: one person, two records
Assigned reviewerHR assurance ·03
DecisionDuplicate confirmed
ActionRecord retired · audit logged

Illustrative interface · masked data

Screening & right to work

One integration to verification routes across 22 countries.

Situation
A screening provider needed verifiable source evidence in jurisdictions that are difficult to reach from a central desk, without rebuilding its case workflow.
Seamfix response
Seamfix provided a single integration beneath the provider's case-management platform, combining digital and assisted verification routes.
Evidence created
Source-level verification evidence returned into the client's existing case record.
What it proves
Difficult-jurisdiction verification can be added without the client changing workflow or ceding the customer relationship.
Reference status
Subject to client approval — anonymised until confirmed.
Case · source verification
Client workflow
JurisdictionDifficult-to-reach source
RouteAssisted verification
Credential checkedIssuer confirmed
Identity linkagePerson matched
Evidence returned to the client's existing case record. The workflow and the customer relationship stay with the client.

Illustrative interface · masked data

Telecommunications

One control pattern reused across several operator markets.

Situation
An operator group needed consistent subscriber controls in markets with different regulators, identity sources and operating realities.
Seamfix response
Common Platform controls were reused across markets, while policy, integrations and the local operating model stayed market-specific.
Evidence created
Market-level registration evidence produced under one common control model.
What it proves
Reuse the trust controls; engineer the programme — even when each market has its own regulator.
Platform capability you can infer
Configurable forms, API & source integration, multi-tenant governance.
Reference status
Anonymised.
Operator group · control model
Multi-market
MarketPlatform controlsPolicyIntegrations
Market AReusedLocalLocal
Market BReusedLocalLocal
Market CReusedLocalLocal

Illustrative interface · masked data

What the cases let you infer about the Platform.

  • Telecom remediation under regulatory pressure

    Capture anywhere, biometric services, device management, reporting & audit.

  • National identity ecosystem

    Multi-tenant governance, identity & authentication, device management, reporting & audit.

  • Cross-border credential service

    Credential services, capture anywhere, review & approval, API & source integration.

  • Workforce identity remediation

    Biometric services, review & approval, reporting & audit.

  • Multi-market telecom configuration

    Configurable forms, API & source integration, multi-tenant governance.

Cases do not imply that the same product configuration ran in every programme.

Request references under NDA.

Named references, deeper case detail and security or procurement evidence are shared through a controlled process.

What has to work?

Bring us one process that is slow, exposed, hard to verify or difficult to defend. We will help define the smallest useful first step.