If you ever peek at our codebase hoping for something clever, you might be a little disappointed. A lot of it is almost aggressively boring. That’s on purpose.
Early on, I thought great engineering meant clever engineering: the slick one-liner, the abstraction nobody else would have thought of. Then I spent enough late nights debugging someone’s “brilliant” code (sometimes my own) to learn the hard way. Clever is fun to write and miserable to maintain.
When you build systems that people’s identities run through, boring is a feature. Boring code is code the next person can read at 2am without a map. It’s predictable. It fails in obvious ways instead of mysterious ones. It does the one thing it says it does, and nothing sneaky on the side.
So we optimize for boring on purpose. Clear names over cute ones. Obvious solutions over impressive ones. Code a new teammate can follow on day one, not day ninety. Around here, “wow, this is simple” is the highest compliment you can pay a pull request.
That doesn’t mean we avoid hard problems. We solve plenty of them. It just means we’d rather the hard part live in the thinking, and the boring part live in the code.
Clever ages badly. Clear lasts. We’ll take clear every time.
Reliability: The Foundation of Digital Identity
June 30, 2026
When people think about digital identity, they often focus on the outcome—a successful identity verification, a completed SIM registration, or seamless access to a digital
